Which measurement puck was used made significant differences in overall performance depending on the monitor screen technology. Some calibration software supports multiple measurement devices. Our reviews hold equally well for both platforms. No significant differences were seen in performance or usability between Windows and Mac monitor calibration systems. Additional tests were performed on OSX 10.6. The majority of the test systems ran Windows 7 圆4.
Monitors types tested (as of June, 2010): Cheap monitors designed only for gaming response times and having 6-bit internal processing are not capable of sufficiently good color performance that profiling and calibration are useful. All monitors tested had 8-bit or higher internal LUTs. The ovberall characteristics of the monitors are what is most important. The exact brands of monitor are not critical what is current today will be outdated in short order. Some calibration systems perform better on certain classes of display than on others. We group the performance of the monitor profiling sysems by the type of monitor used.
#Automatic display control allows the i1 profiler good for mac? full
For a full listing of the displays used, see our monitor profiling details page. We included a few lower end displays as well. Of monitors used by professional photographers. These tend to be higher end displays, as it is bothĮasier to evaluate profiling and calibration performance on these systems, and they are representative We both use and evaluate many monitor calibration and profiling instruments. Hardware calibration systems: which ones to buy and use?
0 kommentar(er)
